the False Peace",
a review by Carroll Quigley
of a book:
Munich, ou la drôle de paix,
by Henri Nogučres.
XXX: Paris, 1963
"Munich, the False Peace"
Munich, ou la drôle de paix
By Henri Nogučres (Paris, 1963)
This is a straightforward and well-informed account of
the Czechoslovak crisis of 1938 from the occupation of Austria on 12
March to the Munich agreement of 29 September 1938. It is a little
pedestrian but is logically developed and easily followed. It is based
on a wide reading in secondary accounts and some superficial sampling of
the primary printed materials, notably the Nuremberg trials, but has
taken nothing from the captured German Foreign Ministry documents or
from the published papers of the British Foreign Office. However, the
interpretation is fair and well-established and would not be much
modified by wider research from the sources now available.
The chief value of the book is its accounts of the French and the
Czech sides of these events which are generally ignored in books from
the English side. Of the existing accounts of this crisis we now have
those of Winston Churchill, the older and just re-published volume of J.W. Wheeler-Bennett (Munich, Prologue to Tragedy. Macmillan:
London, 1963), and the new book of Martin Gilbert and Richard Gott:
The Appeasers (Houghton Mifflin: Boston, 1963).
The last of these will provided the real competition to this
volume, if it is published in English. The Gilbert-Gott is more
scholarly and better written, but it covers the whole period 1933-40,
and is done strictly from the English point of view, lacking all the
dramatic anguish of the Czech experience or the complex intrigue which
went on in Paris. For these two things, which are not so well known as
the preambulations of Neville Chamberlain, it would probably be
worth-while to publish this book.
The chance of making any real money out of this book seems slight,
and it would be no great loss if it did not appear in English. If it is
published, it might gain some slight advantage over the Gilbert-Gott
volume if it were offered under the title, Munich, the False Peace
in order to attract attention from those who will claim that the Kennedy
agreements with the Soviet Union will lead to a “Munich.” The title of
the Gilbert-Gott is not attractive, implying biographical studies of men
already dead rather than an analysis of a problem of continuing concern.
-- Carroll Quigley
Please email the editors (firstname.lastname@example.org)
with corrections, questions, or if you have other works by Professor Quigley you
would like to see posted.
©2008-2018 All rights reserved. CarrollQuigley.net