Variant, Vol. 2, Number 10 (Spring 2000), pp. 24.
TRAGEDY AND HOPE: A HISTORY OF THE WORLD IN OUR TIME.
By Carroll Quigley.
(New York: Macmillan Company. 1966. pp. xi, 1348. $12.50.)
On a number of occasions, most notably during his inaugural address as
President, Bill Clinton has paid tribute to one of the people who taught him as
a student, a man called Carroll Quigley.1 To at least 99% of
those who heard the speech, the name meant nothing. But it sent a major frisson
through a section of American conspiracy theorists. They knew who Carroll
Quigley was; what they didn’t know was why the President of the United States
was naming him in such a public way.
The American conspiracy
theorist has always known that there were people out to destroy the paradise
that was mythical America, land of the brave, home of the free. But they kept
changing their minds about the identity of the evil conspirators. Was it the
Catholics? The Masons? The Jews? The bankers? The East coast elite of ‘old
money’? Fabians? After 1917 they knew it was International Communism but they
weren’t sure if there was someone else behind the Red Menace. Some suspected
that Communism was merely a front for international Jewry (weren’t Marx and
Engels Jews?). Sometimes all the suspects were amalgamated into one vast,
muddled, fudge as in this early 1950s formulation in which the threat was a
‘Fabian, Rhodes Scholar, Zionist, Pinko, Communist, New Deal, Fair Deal,
In the mid-1960s the most important of the American conspiracy theory groups of
the time, the John Birch Society, discovered the 1920s writing of a dead English
writer called Nesta Webster. Webster had been quite widely read in Britain just
after WW1 and she claimed to detect behind both French and Russian Revolutions
the presence of an 18th century Masonic lodge called the Illuminati. On finding
Webster, the Birchers looked as though they were about to move from being the
most fervent exponents of the Great Communist Conspiracy Theory—Birch leader
Robert Welch famously called President Eisenhower a ‘conscious agent of
international communism’—to a belief in the Illuminati as the all-powerful
secret group pulling the strings behind the facade.3 But just as the
organisation was about to make this shift, the Birchers’ discovered a book by
the aforementioned Professor Carroll Quigley, Tragedy and Hope. Which is where
the story gets interesting.
Quigley’s Tragedy and Hope was published in New York by Macmillan in 1966.
It was 1300 pages long. Its subtitle, a history of the world in our time,
gives a sense of its ambition and scope; yet the 1300 pages carried no
documentation, no sources of any kind. Educated at Harvard and Princeton,
Quigley taught at the School of Foreign Service, Harvard,Yale, the Brookings
Institute and the Foreign Service Institute of the State Department—all
major league, American ruling class institutions.4
Despite his impeccable academic credentials, the book being published by a
major firm, and its unusual length and scope, Tragedy and Hope attracted
only two tiny, dismissive, reviews from Quigley’s peers.5
The American academic world blanked the book. Having had no reviews, the
book didn’t sell and Macmillan destroyed the plates from which the first
edition had been printed.6 When the American writer Robert
Eringer tracked Quigley down just before his death, Quigley warned him that
writing about him and his book could get Eringer into trouble.
What had Quigley done to deserve this extraordinary treatment? He had done
two things. First, unusually for a mainstream American historian, Quigley
had described in some detail the rise of what he calls ‘finance capital’ in
20th century history. Second, more importantly, he included two sections,
amounting to less than 20 of the book’s 1300 pages, which described the
formation and some of the activities of an organisation known as the Round
Table and its origins in the megalomaniacal fantasies of the 19th century
British imperialist Cecil Rhodes.
In the sections of
Tragedy and Hope which caused Quigley problems, he claims that an
organisation, variously titled the Rhodes-Milner Group, the Round Table, and
just the Milner group, had virtual control over British foreign policy for
much of the first half of this century when Britain was one of the world’s
leading powers. The inner core of this group, the Round Table, was a secret
society founded by Cecil Rhodes. Using Rhodes’ money, this group set up the
Round Table groups in then British Dominions; the Council on Foreign
Relations in the U.S.; the network of Royal Institutes of International
Affairs; the various Institutes of Pacific Relations; controlled The Times
and the Observer, All Souls in Oxford and the Rhodes Scholarship program;
was largely responsible for the destruction of the League of Nations and the
appeasement policies of the 1930s and converted the British Empire into the
Commonwealth. These ‘gracious and cultivated men of somewhat limited social
experience’ as Quigley describes them, ‘constantly thought in terms of
Anglo-American solidarity, of political partition and federation... were
convinced that they could gracefully civilise the Boers of South Africa, the
Irish, the Arabs and the Hindus... and were largely responsible for the
partition of Ireland, Palestine and India, and for the federations of South
Africa, Central Africa and the West Indies.7 And so on and
It is not that the Round Table people have been
unknown. The names Quigley gives—e.g. in the inner group: Rhodes,
Rothschild, William Stead, Viscount Esher, Milner, Abe Bailey, Earl Grey,
H.A.L. Fisher, Jan Smuts, Leopold Amery, the Astors—are well known.8
The Round Table group are conventionally viewed as a group
of enthusiastic imperialists who had a period of some visibility and
influence in the 1910-20 period. Their journal, The Round Table, was well
known between the wars, and is in many university libraries. (It continued
until the mid 1970s, folded and was relaunched in the 1980s.)
Orthodox historians who have written about the Round Table people offer
accounts of the period which are, more or less, consonant with Quigley’s
thesis.9 Toynbee, for example, attributes the Royal
Institute of International Affairs to the Round Table people; and Butler,
himself part of the group in Quigley’s longer account, acknowledges that the
so-called ‘Cliveden Set’ of the 1930s were, as Quigley claims, merely the
Round Table at one of their regular meeting places.
his biography of Rhodes, Flint gives a good deal of room to an account of
the size and possible influence of the Rhodes Scholar network. He writes of
‘the excessive number of Rhodes Scholars in the Kennedy Administration’ and
of the Rhodes Scholars forming ‘a recognisable elite in Canada.10
Apparently unaware of Quigley, Flint notes that ‘in each of the white
settled Commonwealth countries, South Africa and the United States, a
similar, if less influential elite, had emerged... and since 1948 India,
Pakistan and Ceylon may be experiencing a similar develop- ment... Rhodes
Scholars created links between American, British and Commonwealth
“establishments”... and they have played a role in creating the “special
relationship” between the U.S., Britain and the dominions after 1945.11
Kendle, although he dismisses Quigley’s thesis without an
explanation, is of particular interest: he, at least, had read Tragedy and
Hope. No other historian of the period seems to have done so.12
Enter the ‘radical right’
The one group of people who took Quigley to heart were the
conspiracy theorists of the ‘radical right’ in America for whom Tragedy and
Hope became a kind of bible. Here was the proof, the academically
respectable proof, of the great conspiracy. It may not have been quite the
conspiracy they had in mind, but it was a conspiracy none the less.13
Only a handful of academics have taken Quigley on board—Shoup and Minter,
Carl Oglesby, Pieterse and van der Pijl—and none of them are mainstream
Anglo-American historians.14 To that august body Quigley
remains unknown—or unmentionable.
account of the Round Table in Tragedy and Hope comes to a halt after WW2.
The Round Table was one manifestation of the power of the British Empire
and, as that disintegrated after the war, to be replaced by the new American
economic empire, so the Round Table network’s influence waned. The Rhodes
Scholar network is still there;15
the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) is still the single dominant force in
the formation of American foreign policy;16
and from the CFR grew the Trilateral Commission in the early 1970s.
President Clinton has been a member of both—as well as a Rhodes Scholar.17
Even without the article of endorsement by the Trilateral Commission
founder, David Rockefeller, just before the 1992 presidential election,18
Bill Clinton was obviously Jimmy Carter 2—another southern Democrat
governor, sponsored and groomed by the Trilateral/CFR networks.19
The Royal Institute of International Affairs is still going strong in this
country but much of its standing as an ‘unofficial foreign office’ has
declined with the rise of other foreign policy think tanks. The last
sighting of the Round Table as an organisation I have seen is a reference to
it in the early 1970s.20
thesis presents the familiar problems raised by the existence of all such
elite groups: how to decide whether any particular policy outcome advocated
by such groups was in fact the result of their advocacy. Even in his book
solely about the Round Table network, Quigley mostly alleges rather than
actually proving, the causal connections. (But the fact that he was so comprehensively blanked by academic history is, of course, a rather
substantial hint that was on to something.)
In a sense
what Quigley describes as the Round Table’s conspiracy is merely the
traditional behaviour of the British ruling class—only systematised
slightly. Instinctively secretive, until recently more or less protected
from public scrutiny by its control of the mass media and from academic
investigation by its control of the universities, in a sense the British
ruling class is the most successful ‘conspiracy’ ever seen. But Quigley
claimed more than that. He actually asserts the existence of an
honest-to-goodness secret society operating at the heart of British foreign
policy in the years between the war whose activities can be traced across
the British Commonwealth and the United States. For an establishment
professor of history this was a remarkable thing to have done in 1966 when
discussion of the influence of elite management groups such as the CFR, RIIA
and Bilderberg—especially the latter—was confined almost exclusively to the
far right. These days such groups are discussed a little more openly; but
the fact that the minutes of the 1999 Bilderberg meeting were leaked and
posted on the Internet was not reported by any of the major British print
media. It is thus perhaps not a surprise that Anglo-American historians
remain almost completely ignorant of, or silent on, the existence of
Quigley’s two books.
An early sighting of Clinton’s esteem for Quigley is in Antaeus: Journals,
Notebooks and Diaries, ed. Daniel Halpern (London: Collins Harvill, 1989).
This is on p. 73 from the then largely unknown Governor Bill Clinton: ‘I had
a course in western civilisation with a remarkable man, the late Carroll
Quigley. Half the people at Georgetown thought he was a bit crazy and the
other half thought he was a genius. They were both right.’
This is discussed in Daniel Brandt, ‘Clinton, Quigley, and Conspiracy’, in
NameBase Newsline, no. 1 April 1993—a supplement to subscribers to Brandt’s
NameBase data base. This is available on line at
Cited on p.77 of George Thayer, The Farther Shore of Politics (London: Allen
3. On Nesta Webster and the
Bircher’s discovery of her, see Richard Gilman, Behind World Revolution: the
Strange Career of Nesta H. Webster, (Ann Arbor: Insight Books, 1982),
especially pp. 4-6.
4. Quigley’s entry is in Who’s
Who in America, 1966 through 1977.
5. In Virginia
Quarterly Review, Spring 1966, and Annals of the American Academy of
Political and Social Science, November 1966.
Robert Eringer, The Global Manipulators (Bristol: Pentacle Books, 1980) p.9.
Tragedy and Hope was eventually reprinted in 1974 by the ‘radical right’ and
has been in print ever since.
7. Tragedy and Hope p.
8. Quigley wrote a book exclusively about the
Round Table network which, though written in 1949, was not published until
after his death. It is in this book, The Anglo-American Establishment (New
York: Books in Focus, 1981), that the details of the group’s membership
and alleged activities are given.
9. D. C. Ellinwood
Jnr., ‘The Round Table Movement and India 1909-20’ in the Journal of
Commonwealth Political Studies, November 1971; A. L. Rowse, All Souls and
Appeasement (London: Macmillan, 1961); M. G. Fry, Illusions of Security
(Toronto: University of Toronto, 1972); W. B. Nimocks, ‘Lord Milner’s
Kindergarten and the Origins of the Round Table’ in South Atlantic
Quarterly, Autumn 1964; D. C. Watt, Personalities and Policies (London:
Longman’s, London 1965); J. Kendle, The Round Table Movement and Imperial
Union (Toronto: University of Toronto, 1975); J. R.M. Butler, Lord Lothian
(London: Macmillan, 1960); F. Madden and D.K. Fieldhouse (eds.) Oxford and
the Idea of the Commonwealth (London: Croom Helm, 1982); David Astor, Tribal
Feeling (London: John Murray, 1964); Arnold Toynbee, Acquaintances (Oxford:
Oxford University Press, 1967).
10. John Flint,
Cecil Rhodes (Hutchinson, London, 1976). In the US, six in the State
Department and at least 12 in the upper reaches of the administration.
See Arthur Schlesinger, A Thousand Days (London 1975) p. 181. JFK’s father
was close to the Round Table people while U.S. Ambassador to London in the
1930s. In Canada, Flint provides a list, circa 1973, beginning with the
Governor General, three cabinet ministers, head of the armed forces, most of
the permanent officials in the civil service, etc etc. Flint pp. 244-5.
11. Flint p. 245.
12. Kendle p.
305—the last paragraph of the book.
13. See for
example the best known of the Bircher’s books, None Dare Call It Conspiracy
by Gary Allen and Larry Abraham (Seal Beach, California; Concord Press,
14. Carl Oglesby, The Yankee and Cowboy War
(New York: Berkley Medallion, 1977); Laurence Shoup and William Minter,
Imperial Brain Trust (London and New York: Monthly Review Press, 1977); Kees
van der Pijl, The Making of an Atlantic Ruling Class (London: Verso, 1984);
Jan Nederveen Pieterse, Empire and Emancipation (London: Pluto, 1989). Shoup
and Minter are American Marxists and are only interested in the Round Table
as the parent body of the Council on Foreign Relations; Oglesby is a
maverick historian, former SDS activist, so far from mainstream intellectual
life as to be publicly interested in the Kennedy assassination; Pieterse and
Pijls are Dutch Marxists.
15. They had a great
reunion in Oxford, attended by the Queen, in 1983. See Time, July 11 1983.
When that article was published, Time had six Rhodes Scholars on it.
16. This is extensively and repeatedly documented by the
Website calling itself roundtable at www.geocities.com/CapitolHill/2807
17. So obvious has Clinton’s education in the
Anglo-American elite become, even the Sunday Telegraph had a long piece on
the Rhodes Scholars connection, sneering at the Rhodies in the Clinton
administration as ‘charming dreamers’. See 21 March 1983, p. 22.
18. New York Times, October 16 1992.
On Jimmy Carter and the Trilateral Commission, see for example, Jeff
Frieden, ‘The Trilateral Commission: Economics and Politics in the 1970s’,
in Monthly Review, December 1977.
20. Cecil King,
Diaries (London 1975) p. 52.
Scan of Orignal Review