"Tropical 
		Africa",  
A review by Carroll Quigley
		in The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social 
		Sciences, Vol. 336 (July 1961), pp. 197-198, 
		of a two-volume book 
		TROPICAL AFRICA:  
		Vol. I, Land and Livelihood,  
		Vol. II, Society and Polity, 
		by George Herbert Tinbey Kimble. 603 & 506 pages. New 
		York, NY: Twentieth Century Fund, 1960. 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
		  
		
		
		"Tropical Africa"
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
		George T. Kimble. 
		Tropical Africa, 
		Vol. I: Land and Livelihood;  
		Vol. II: Society and Polity.  
		Pp. 603, 506. New York: Twentieth Century Fund, 1960. $15.00. 
		 
		 
   This massive work, seven years in progress, 
		has been whipped into an attractive -- if occasionally verbose -- 
		narrative from the working papers of forty-six experts.  The author, 
		former Director of the American Geographical Society and now Professor 
		of Geography at Indiana University, correctly emphasizes two points: the 
		heterogeneity of tropical Africa and the frequent inapplicability of our 
		Western methods in an African context. To these should be added a third: 
		the critical significance of priorities in attacking Africa's problems, 
		independent of our own, Western, preferences.  I have discussed this 
		problem for the French areas in Current History for February 1961. 
		  
   One general weakness of this presentation -- probably carried over 
		from the working papers -- is its failure to aim at a single level of 
		readers. Some elementary matters are covered at length, while, 
		elsewhere, technical knowledge is assumed by the use of a technical 
		vocabulary employing, for example, words such as "climax" in ecology, 
		"stages" in forest structure, or "excessive solar radiation" (p. 227) 
		with reference to soils. Generally, the first third of the work suffers 
		from lack of explicit definition and poor arrangement.  This results 
		from the failure of Chapter Two to show the relationships of relief, 
		soils,
		rainfall, and vegetation in Africa as a whole. The discussion of soils 
		and water should have preceded that on vegetation and settlement. In 
		this way, the section on soils (p. 237) need, not have intruded into the 
		chapter on waters. Chapter Six on forests is puzzling to a beginner 
		because it fails to explain the basic role of light intensity or the 
		concept of layers within the forest; as a result, the elementary reader 
		will not understand why tropical forests are not "true selection 
		forests" (p. 215). 
		  
   Similar weaknesses appear in Volume II, Chapter Fourteen, "The Old 
		Order," provides no adequate picture of traditional African society 
		because it fails to show how the individual and the family were both 
		subordinated to larger groups by customs such as bride-price, segmented 
		age groups, rites of transition, and social magic. Instead, a 
		disjointed and inchoate presentation emerges from the mistaken premise 
		that the family is dominant in African societies. Nor does it seem 
		necessary to have eighteen of forty-eight pages on the "old order" 
		describe diseases. 
		  
   In spite of the great mass of isolated factual material presented 
		in these volumes, no reader of them is likely to come to grips with the 
		real issues of contemporary Africa. The undigested material on "Social 
		Change" in Chapter Fifteen could have been given real meaning had it 
		been organized in terms of the factors which disrupted traditional 
		African society -- slave raiding; firearms; disrupted balance of wild 
		life ecology; commercialization by money; missionary activities; 
		weakening of customary social sanctions -- such as magic; large scale 
		contract and migratory labor; infectious diseases raised to epidemic 
		level by accelerating social contacts; spreading literacy; and easier 
		mobility. It is perfectly true that African society was never static, 
		but it can be understood only in terms of social units, which emphasized 
		status, being disrupted into atomistic individualism, which 
		emphasizes personal decision. 
		  
   The failure to get to the real issues of contemporary Africa is 
		fairly general throughout the book in spite of its plethora of factual 
		material. Chapter Sixteen, for example, gives a great volume of 
		disorganized information on African education, but hardly mentions the 
		big issues of the day such as education for all versus 
		education of an elite; education in a European language or in a 
		vernacular; and education in residential or in local schools, in 
		technical or in liberal subjects, or for both sexes equally. 
		  
		  
				CARROLL QUIGLEY  
				Professor of History 
				School of Foreign Service  
		Georgetown University 
		
		  
		
		  
		
		Scans of original review 
		
		
		
		
		1 
		
		
		
		
		
		2 
		
		
		
		
		
		
     
    	
		
		  
		  
     
    
    
    
| 
    
 | 
 
    
		
| 
 
Please email the editors (editors@carrollquigley.net) 
with corrections, questions, or if you have other works by Professor Quigley you 
would like to see posted. 
©2008-2018 All rights reserved. CarrollQuigley.net  | 
 
 
     | 
 
 
    
	| 
  |   |